April 23, 2024 HelpLineTamperproof Photography |
A) Of course, mandating the use only of film is making an assumption that film cant be used to fabricate evidence. Anyone who has played with double exposures can break that assumption pretty easily. But while your City Councils arent alone in requiring the use of film, there are also many locales that use digital photography for evidence gathering. Some digital SLR manufacturers have implemented systems to help ensure images are secure. Theres technology that exists to help ensure images are secure. For example, Canons system pairs sophisticated data security with image-verification technology. This method locks up images so they can be displayed only with secure software, and it can verify if the image has been modified. Special image-verification data is embedded into the image when the digital SLR captures the image. More information can be found at: www.canon.com Lexar has its LockTight system that works with Nikon equipment. It doesnt have the image-verification system, but it does use security to minimize access to images on a card. Details on that system can be found at: www.lexar.com On the software side of things, I know there are people who are currently investigating algorithms that will attempt to determine if a photographic image has been altered. By evaluating pixels and comparing organic vs. artificial pixel alignment, it might be possible to detect artificial pixels without knowing what the original data looked like. Its a long way off, and there are great difficulties with it. |