| |
Wide-angle
photography opens up
vast new vistas to the
photographer, but “going
wide” presents
a special challenge to
the digital-SLR user.
That’s because
the image sensors used
in most D-SLRs are considerably
smaller than a 35mm film
frame and thus “see” a
smaller portion of the
image produced by any
lens than that seen by
a 35mm SLR. As a result,
a given focal length
produces a narrower angle
of view when used on
a D-SLR than when used
on a 35mm camera.
Most D-SLRs that are based
on the 35mm SLR form factor
have image sensors that
measure around 23.6x15.8mm,
close enough to the 25.05x16.7mm
dimensions of an Advanced
Photo System C-format image
frame that these are commonly
known as “APS-C” format
sensors. Cameras in this
category include all D-SLRs
from Fujifilm, Konica Minolta,
Nikon, Pentax and Samsung,
plus all Canon D-SLRs except
the EOS-1D/Ds series and
EOS 5D.
There are two basic solutions
for wide-angle fans. You
could buy one of the full-frame
D-SLRs, of course (currently,
the Canon EOS-1Ds Mark
II or EOS 5D), on which
all lenses frame just as
they do on a 35mm SLR.
The drawback here is that
those cameras sell for
around $7,000 and $3,000,
respectively.
Fish-Eyes
|
The
widest-angle lenses
are the fish-eyes.
These provide a 180-degree
angle of view and
come in two varieties:
circular and full-frame.
Circular fish-eyes
produce a round image
in the camera’s
standard rectangular
image frame; full-frame
fisheyes fill the
frame, producing
a 180-degree angle
of view measured
from corner to corner.
The only circular fish-eye
on the market today is Sigma’s
8mm ƒ/4, and it produces
a circular image only with
full-frame cameras (35mm
SLRs and full-frame D-SLRs).
On APS-C D-SLRs, the image
frame cuts into the top and
bottom of the circular image.
(Sigma recently announced
a new optimized-for-digital
version of this lens, but
it produces the same framing
with APS-C D-SLRs.)
Three full-frame fish-eyes
have been designed especially
for APS-C D-SLRs: the Nikon
10.5mm ƒ/2.8, the Olympus
8mm ƒ/3.5 and the Pentax
10-17mm ƒ/3.5-4.5 fish-eye
zoom. You can use full-frame
fish-eye lenses designed
for 35mm SLRs on D-SLRs,
but that 1.5x magnification
factor greatly reduces their
impact.
Focal lengths for full-frame
fish-eyes overlap focal lengths
for rec-tiliear (“regular”)
superwide-angle lenses. The
difference is that rectilinear
lenses are corrected for
barrel distortion and (in
theory) render straight lines
as straight lines no matter
where they pass through the
image. Full-frame fish-eyes
exhibit barrel distortion
and curve all straight lines
in an image except those
that pass through the center
of the frame. And, of course,
the fish-eyes have that 180-degree
(diagonal) angle of view,
compared to around 115 degrees
for an equivalent-focal-length
rectilinear lens. |
A considerably less
costly alternative
is to buy one
of the inexpensive 18-55mm
zoom lenses usually offered
as part of a kit with
entry-level D-SLRs.
These are approximately
equivalent to a 28-80mm
zoom on a 35mm SLR, giving
you definite wide-angle
capability; they generally
cost between $100 and
$200.
As a bonus, in most cases
they were designed specifically
for use with APS-C-sensor
D-SLRs, optimizing image
quality and keeping lens
size down.
For really wide-angle
fans, the D-SLR manufacturers
and independent lens
makers
offer a number of very
short focal-length zoom
lenses optimized for
use with APS-C-sensor
D-SLRs.
The accompanying chart
lists these and other
wide-angle lenses for
D-SLRs, but
essentially they start
with a 10mm, 11mm or
12mm focal length, which
on
these D-SLRs is equivalent
to 16-18mm on a 35mm
SLR—extremely
wide-angle. These are terrific
choices for wide-angle
fans because they provide
everything from superwide-angle
to moderate wide-angle
in a single package, allowing
you to adjust framing in
tight spaces and minimizing
the number of lens changes,
which helps keep dust off
the image sensor.
Each D-SLR manufacturer
and independent lens
maker gives its APS-C
D-SLR lenses
an identifying code.
The Canon designation
is EF-S, Nikon and Tokina
are DX, Pentax is DA,
Sigma
is DC and Tamron is Di
II. Because APS-C image
sensors are smaller than
a full 35mm image frame,
lenses designed for cameras
with these sensors don’t
have to produce as large
an image circle. This allows
for smaller lenses that
send light rays more directly
into the image sensor’s
pixels for better image
quality, but means the
lenses can’t be used
on 35mm SLRs or full-frame
D-SLRs, because they’ll
vignette (in some cases,
they can’t even be
mounted on full-frame camera
bodies).
The Olympus Zuiko Digital
lenses are designed specifically
for Four Thirds System
D-SLRs (currently, the
Olympus E-1, Evolt E-330
and Evolt E-500, and
the new Panasonic Lumix
DMC-L1),
which have even smaller
image sensors—17.3x13mm,
with a 2x focal-length
factor.
You can use compatible
film-camera wide-angle
lenses on your D-SLR,
of course; they just
won’t
provide as wide an angle
of view. With an APS-C
format D-SLR, any lens
of 24mm or shorter will
provide noticeable wide-angle
capability.
What To Look For
When choosing a wide-angle
lens for your D-SLR,
your first concerns are
that
the lens in question
will provide the desired
angle
of view and work on your
camera. If you’re
used to 35mm SLRs, you
can determine the focal
length required to provide
the equivalent angle of
view by dividing the 35mm
camera lens’ focal
length by 1.5 for an APS-C-format
D-SLR or by 2 for a Four
Thirds System D-SLR: If
you want an angle of view
equivalent to a 24mm lens
on a 35mm camera, you’ll
need a 16mm lens on an
APS-C D-SLR or a 12mm lens
on a Four Thirds D-SLR.
Next, consider lens speed,
special elements and
focusing mechanism. Faster
lenses
are easier to focus manually
in dim light and autofocus
more quickly. They also
provide a brighter viewfinder
image for easier composing.
But they cost considerably
more than slower lenses
of equivalent focal length.
If you do a lot of low-light
shooting, a faster lens
will be worth the extra
cost; otherwise, probably
not.
Low-dispersion elements
(identified by designations
such as ED, LD, ELD,
HLD, SLD, UD and SUD
in the
lens name) minimize chromatic
aberrations and thus
provide sharper images.
Aspherical
elements reduce spherical
aberrations and edge
distortion and provide
more even illumination
across the image area,
providing better resolution
and contrast, minimizing
the curving of straight
lines at the edges of
the
image and reducing darkened
image corners and edges.
Internal- and rear-focusing
systems move elements
inside the lens instead
of extending
the front elements away
from the camera body.
In wide-angle lenses,
internal
focusing offers several
advantages: The front
element doesn’t rotate during
focusing, handy when using
orientation-sensitive lens
attachments such as polarizers
and graduated filters;
moving smaller internal
elements rather than heavier
front ones makes for quicker
autofocusing; and minimum
focusing distances can
be reduced. Aspherical
elements and internal/rear
focusing also allow for
more compact lens designs.
Getting the Most from Wide-Angle
Lenses
A wide-angle lens will
take in a large slice
of the scene before the
camera.
The biggest faults in
wide-angle shots are
lack of a center
of interest and clutter.
A wide vista with no
visual center lacks impact,
and
the viewer’s eye
tends not to know where
to go. A landscape shot
with interesting cloud
formations or reflections
in a lake can be lovely.
But since it’s all
at a great distance, the
resulting image will have
a flat perspective. After
you shoot such a scene,
look for an angle that
includes a foreground subject
that can add depth to the
image—a tree or a
rock formation. You can
even position a travel
companion strategically
in the shot to add depth.
Try to keep your wide-angle
compositions as simple
as possible. Too many elements
in the picture just con-fuses
the viewer. Because
a wide-angle lens takes
in more of it, a
tilted horizon line is
especially annoying to
the viewer, so be sure
to level the camera.
When photographing buildings
or forests, remember
that
vertical lines in the
image will converge toward
the
top if you tilt the camera
up because the image
(sensor) plane isn’t parallel
to the subject plane—an
interesting effect when
you want it, but generally
not desirable in architectural
renderings.
When you have to get
a whole group of people
in
a shot and can’t
back up far enough due
to a wall or cliff to do
it, a wide-angle lens is
just what you need. But
here’s something
to keep in mind: When using
a really wide-angle lens,
you’re picturing
subjects directly in front
of the camera quite differently
from subjects at the edges
of the frame. With a 90-degree
(horizontal) angle of view,
about what you’d
get with an 11mm lens on
an APS-C-format D-SLR or
a 17mm lens on a 35mm SLR,
the lens takes in subjects
45 degrees to each side.
If you’re photographing
a row of people lined up
across the frame, you’re
viewing the person directly
in front of the camera
square-on, but you’re
viewing those at the edges
of the frame at a 45-degree
angle. You can largely
solve this problem by having
those on the ends turn
toward the camera, so that
the camera “sees” them
all at the same angle.
Another concern is the
distortion caused by
picturing three-dimensional
objects
on a flat surface (the
image sensor, in a digital
camera). Those at the
edges will appear elongated.
This isn’t actually
a result of lens distortion;
it’s just a geometric
fact of life when you
project a three-dimensional
object
onto a flat surface at
an angle. The best solution
is to avoid compositions
that include three-dimensional
objects at the edges.
The most dramatic wide-angle
photos are those made
at close range. Move
very
close to a subject to
render it very large
in the frame,
and the lens’ wide
angle of view will still
include some of the surroundings,
exaggerating the subject’s
size relative to its
environment.
|
|