
|

Eyepoint Revealed
I’ve
been investigating digital SLRs and have come across a term I don’t
understand. What’s eyepoint and why is it important?
Eyepoint is a measurement of how close your eye needs to be to the viewfinder
in order to see the entire image presented by the viewfinder. For example,
if you hold a camera a few inches away from your eye, you’ll be
able to see only a small portion of the center of the viewfinder image.
As you move the camera closer to your eye, you’ll get to a point
where you’ll be able to see the entire view without any vignetting.
The eyepoint specification is measured in millimeters. The higher the
number, the farther away from the camera your eye can be. If you wear
glasses (and a lot of great photographers do), having a higher eyepoint
means that you can see the entire viewfinder image while still wearing
your glasses.
Digital Projection
Format
When
it comes to moving from the traditional slide projector to digital display
media, I’m frustrated because all the projectors I’ve looked
up have a display format ratio similar to computer monitors. The good
old slide projector projects a square format and allows for portrait photos
to have the same display area as landscape. This isn’t the case with
the digital projectors. Consequently, the size of all portrait
pictures are limited to the (shorter) height of the display media. The
pictures are, therefore, displayed at different sizes. Do you know of digital
projectors that have a square display area like traditional slide projectors?
Is there not enough demand for such digital projectors for the industry
to develop such a product?
Projector
manufacturers originally developed these units for PowerPoint displays
and weren’t considering photographers’ needs. Unfortunately,
I don’t know of any square digital projectors.
As to your last question, you have to examine the differences between
manufacturing a slide projector and a digital projector. Instead of projecting
light through an image provided by your transparency, the digital projector
has to re-create the photograph on its imager.
The imager used in the digital projector typically is a piece of highly
complicated silicon. The manufacturing line for producing this silicon
is called a foundry, and foundries are very expensive to create and run.
Manufacturers have to appeal to a wide market in order for a product to
be profitable. Until the market creates a significant demand for square-aspect
projection or the imagers become very inexpensive, the standard 4:3 horizontal
rectangle will likely be the only way digital projectors will be sold.
This situation probably won’t be helped with the advent of high-definition
video, which has an aspect ratio of 16x9 (a horizontal rectangle).
Memory Card Considerations
I’m
considering buying an 8-megapixel digital camera. These high-megapixel cameras
are no doubt memory-hungry, so I’d likely buy a 2 GB card for whatever
camera I purchased. Regarding Lexar’s Write Acceleration (WA)
card, Lexar’s ad makes it sound like the WA feature is something that
works with WA-enabled cameras. Are they talking about cameras with
some special kind of buffer? They state that in cameras without WA,
the card still functions at 80x speed. Can you explain this?
How would this card compare to the SanDisk Extreme 2 GB card? It has
transfer rates of 9 to 10 MB/sec., while the Lexar states a speed of 12
MB/sec., but I don’t know if that’s the 80x speed or the WA
speed. Finally, what about Microdrives?
|
Richard Mancini
Camas, Wash.
|
Memory
cards that support Write Acceleration depend on technology inside the
camera to take advantage of speed improvements. The current cameras supporting
WA include all Kodak Professional cameras and pro camera backs, the Nikon
D1x, D1H, D2H, D100 (with firmware upgrade), Sanyo DSC-MZ3, Sigma SD9
and SD10, Pentax *ist D and Olympus E1.
The 80x specification uses the same speed ratings as optical drives like
CD-ROMs. When CD-ROM read and write speeds are specified, they’re
given as 12x or 32x, and the “x” refers to 150 KB/sec. At
80x, you’re talking about 12 MB/sec. While you might get close to
this speed when you use a card reader attached to a computer, the speed
will be less than half of that with most 8-megapixel cameras.
As for Microdrives, they will be slower than the cards you’ve listed.
Also, since they’re actually miniature hard drives, they have moving
parts and can be delicate pieces of technology. If you’re expecting
your media to go through any type of rough treatment, I’d keep that
in mind.
Regarding memory cards, you’re correct that the cameras need lots
of memory. One thing to consider is using several smaller cards, rather
than putting all your money into one large card. There are several benefits.
If you lose a card or one fails, you won’t lose all of your images
or your ability to take pictures. Smaller cards also mean shorter download
times per card.
Finally, depending on your workflow, archiving can be a little easier
if you have cards that are about the size of your archive medium. For
example, I travel with a couple of 1 GB cards. I never fill them up all
the way. After I edit out the bad images, I can archive the good ones
to a CD.
If you have any questions, please send them to HelpLine, PCPhoto
Magazine, 12121 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 1200, Los Angeles, CA 90025 or
[email protected].Visit
our Website at www.pcphotomag.com
for past HelpLine columns.
|

|